Supreme Court revives lawsuits by US victims of terrorism attacks against Palestinian authorities

According to the plaintiffs, Open -handed marketed itself as a tech-driven disruptor in residential real estate but was actually using a human-influenced pricing process that made it “just as susceptible to changing economic conditions as any other traditional real estate company.”

The lawsuit claimed Opendoor “misleadingly portrayed the company as a tech disruptor that used AI-powered algorithms to buy and sell homes more profitably and efficiently than other traditional real estate companies.”

The plaintiffs also alleged that the company failed to disclose key weaknesses in its pricing model during volatile market shifts, contributing to a steep 94% decline in Opendoor’s stock price from its December 2020 IPO to November 2022.

Read next: Opendoor’s new financing app targets wide audience

In court filings, Opendoor denied any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the case to avoid the “expense, risk, and uncertainty of further litigation.” The company is represented by Lyle Roberts of A&O Shearman.

  • Related Posts

    Supreme Court allows victims of terrorist attacks to sue the Palestinian Authority

    King County Assessor John Wilson is pushing back against past accusations of stalking and harassing his former fiancée, Lee Keller, as several public figures have urged him to resign while…

    Rightsizing the U.N. Counterterrorism System

    Please enable JS and disable any ad blocker

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *