Supreme Court revives lawsuits by US victims of terrorism attacks against Palestinian authorities

According to the plaintiffs, Open -handed marketed itself as a tech-driven disruptor in residential real estate but was actually using a human-influenced pricing process that made it “just as susceptible to changing economic conditions as any other traditional real estate company.”

The lawsuit claimed Opendoor “misleadingly portrayed the company as a tech disruptor that used AI-powered algorithms to buy and sell homes more profitably and efficiently than other traditional real estate companies.”

The plaintiffs also alleged that the company failed to disclose key weaknesses in its pricing model during volatile market shifts, contributing to a steep 94% decline in Opendoor’s stock price from its December 2020 IPO to November 2022.

Read next: Opendoor’s new financing app targets wide audience

In court filings, Opendoor denied any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the case to avoid the “expense, risk, and uncertainty of further litigation.” The company is represented by Lyle Roberts of A&O Shearman.

  • Related Posts

    Supreme Court allows terrorism victims to sue Palestinian groups – UPI.com

    On June 13, 2025, a federal court in the Northern District of California held that a putative Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) class action lawsuit belonged in arbitration, thanks to…

    Palestine Action to be banned after RAF base break in

    For the first time, Christine Arnold is speaking publicly about her legal battle with Copart Inc., a North Texas-based Fortune 500 company and global leader in car auctions with locations…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *